[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.150.215. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
September 8, 1999

Higher Standards for Epidemiologic Studies—Replication Prior to Publication?

Author Affiliations
 

Margaret AWinkerMD, Deputy EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Interim CoeditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 1999;282(10):937-938. doi:10.1001/jama.282.10.937

To the Editor: In his commentary on epidemiologic studies and meta-analysis in drug development and surveillance, Dr Temple1 suggests that medical journals impose 3 higher standards on epidemiologic studies. Two of these should invoke little concern. Who is not in favor of any scientist doing a better job describing methods and their limitations? However, Temple's third suggestion—that epidemiologic studies with relative risks of 2.0 or less not be published until replicated in a different environment—is alarming.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×