[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.159.27. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
September 8, 1999

Higher Standards for Epidemiologic Studies—Replication Prior to Publication?—Reply

Author Affiliations
 

Margaret AWinkerMD, Deputy EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Interim CoeditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 1999;282(10):937-938. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-282-10-jbk0908

In Reply: Dr Weed is critical of my suggestion that epidemiologists consider not reporting small relative risks (perhaps 2 or 3) until the observation is replicated in a different environment. The replication, in addition to showing that the observation can be repeated, would be more stringently designed, with fully detailed prospectively described protocols and a single hypothesis. Weed gives 4 reasons for believing that "mandating replication prior to publication is a bad idea." None seems persuasive.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×