[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.168.204. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
February 2, 2000

Quality of Health Care and the HMO Marketplace

Author Affiliations
 

Phil B.FontanarosaMD, Deputy EditorIndividualAuthorStephen J.LurieMD, PhD, Fishbein FellowIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 2000;283(5):602-605. doi:10.1001/jama.283.5.601

To the Editor: The article by Dr Himmelstein and colleagues1 is a clear example of drawing inappropriate conclusions to advance a thinly veiled agenda: for-profit HMOs are bad and national health insurance is needed. The authors have extrapolated from a set of problematic proxy data (HEDIS), voluntarily reported by a nonrandom sample of HMOs, to draw the illogical conclusion that quality of care in investor-owned HMOs is inferior to that of not-for-profit HMOs. Lacing the article with statistical jargon may obfuscate but cannot hide the authors' apparent disregard for the scientific method.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×