[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 50.16.17.16. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
March 1, 2000

Evaluating Clinical Studies of Drug Efficacy

Author Affiliations
 

Phil B.FontanarosaMD, Deputy EditorIndividualAuthorStephen J.LurieMD, PhD, Fishbein FellowIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 2000;283(9):1139-1140. doi:10.1001/jama.283.9.1137

To the Editor: The article by Dr McAlister and colleagues1 raises some interesting issues in evaluating clinical trials of drug efficacy. Although we agree that the best evidence for efficacy comes from head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs), we think that observational studies can provide valuable results in a comparison of drugs and that this class of study should not merit the lowest weight. McAlister et al may be unaware of new developments in design, such as case-crossover studies2 and the use of propensity scores,3 which overcome some of the threats to validity. In fact, the whole purpose of propensity scores is to put observational data into an RCT framework. Moreover, we think that direct comparisons of clinical outcomes should carry more weight than the use of surrogate measures. For example, the effect of statins in preventing cardiovascular events may be due to improving lipid profiles or lowering of blood pressure or both.4

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×