[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.167.149.128. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
September 6, 2000

Use of Performance Data to Change Physician Behavior

Author Affiliations
 

Stephen J.LurieMD, PhD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Executive Deputy EditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 2000;284(9):1079. doi:10.1001/jama.284.9.1079

To the Editor: I commend Dr Marshall and colleagues1 on their efforts to assess the impact of performance data on clinical behavior and outcomes. Having spent a good deal of time working with clinicians and using data to influence change,2,3 I certainly agree with the authors that physicians are often skeptical about performance data. Skepticism arises from concerns related to intent, accuracy, physician attribution, and relevance. Intent relates to the concern that data will be used punitively rather than to identify opportunities for improvement. Accuracy is an issue because of concerns related to errors in coding, chart documentation, and the questionable clinical assumptions and interpretations derived from administrative data sets. As a result, the first reaction on the part of many clinicians is to challenge the accuracy of performance data. The third issue is relevance. Given the subtleties of medical management among unique patient populations, physicians may not view performance data as a meaningful measure of their individual practice efficiency.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×