[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.17.193. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
May NaN, 2001

Planning Medical Services for the End of Life—Reply

Author Affiliations
 

Stephen J.LurieMD, PhD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorJody W.ZylkeMD, Contributing EditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 2001;285(20):2578-2579. doi:10.1001/jama.285.20.2578

In Reply: I do not advocate "eliminating an existing [hospice] reimbursement," as Dr Alexander contends. Reforms will require testing of other innovative approaches. Hospice is the only widely available, comprehensive, generally well-liked care program for the end of life. I hope we can build on its successes.

Alexander also objects to my claim that interdisciplinary teams might limit physician autonomy. Working with effective, knowledgeable teams probably enhances the insight and creativity of care planning, but it also limits the authority of the physician to act alone. Since this restricts opportunities to act on inadequate information or idiosyncratic preferences and habits, this would probably improve quality. Thus, physicians should embrace this restriction.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×