[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
June 6, 2001

The Role of Local Institutional Review Boards in Protecting Human Research Subjects

Author Affiliations
 

Stephen J.LurieMD, PhD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorJody W.ZylkeMD, Contributing EditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 2001;285(21):2713. doi:10.1001/jama.285.21.2713

To the Editor: Dr Morse and colleagues1 propose that the initial review of adverse event reports in clinical trials be the responsibility of a data monitoring committee (DMC), and that institutional review boards (IRBs) only receive collated summaries. This would prevent local IRBs from being overwhelmed with the need to review thousands of individual adverse event reports from multicenter trials. Local IRBs have neither the context (eg, denominators, study assignments) nor the resources to do so. However, we are still concerned about the role envisioned for the local IRB.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×