Stephen J.LurieMD, PhD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorJody W.ZylkeMD, Contributing EditorIndividualAuthor
Copyright 2001 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.
Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.2001
To the Editor: In his review of the second
edition of Theodore Marmor's classic book The Politics of
Medicare, Dr Kane1 allows that "[t]his
book provides just what its title promises." Who could object? Surprisingly,
Kane does, arguing that "for most readers the politics is less interesting
than the substance." Serious books, especially influential texts, should be
subject to rigorous critical review. But Kane's assertions about Medicare's
politics and history, and about the politics of health policy more generally,
are doubly misplaced. Besides being only vaguely related to Marmor's book,
they are thoroughly contradicted by the growing body of work in the field
of health policy and politics.
Frankford DM, Goldberg MA, Hacker JS, Oberlander J, Peterson MA. Politics and Medicare. JAMA. 2001;286(21):2670-2671. doi:10.1001/jama.286.21.2665