[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.207.116. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
August 10, 2011

Biomarkers for Detecting and Risk-Stratifying Chronic Kidney Disease—Reply

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: University of California, San Francisco (Dr Peralta) (carmenalicia.peralta@ucsf.edu); and San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco (Dr Shlipak).

JAMA. 2011;306(6):611-612. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1112

In Reply: Dr Fabri points out that the robustness of a predictive model would be enhanced if different cutoff values were used to define CKD, rather than the clinical cut points that we used. However, our study was intended to provide the clinician with a framework that could easily be used to risk-stratify persons classified as having CKD by creatinine level. Moreover, our data suggest that multiple markers may identify persons at high risk for death and end-stage renal disease who are missed by assessing only creatinine level. If our intention had been to evaluate the best predictive model, then we likely would have found that different cut points for each marker might have been more appropriate; we previously found that even mildly reduced estimated GFR (eGFR) identified by cystatin C was associated with adverse events.1 We believe having different cut points for each marker would be less readily applicable in clinical practice.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×