[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.94.5. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Viewpoint
January 4, 2012

Withholds to Slow Medicare SpendingA Better Deal Than Cuts

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Lebanon, New Hampshire (Drs Skinner, Weinstein, and Fisher); Department of Economics, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire (Dr Skinner); Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon (Dr Weinstein); and Department of Medicine, Dartmouth Medical School, Hanover (Dr Fisher).

JAMA. 2012;307(1):43-44. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1946

Consensus has emerged on the need to slow Medicare spending growth, but there is no agreement on how best to do so. Although many approaches have been suggested, Congress is almost certain to consider across-the-board cuts in reimbursement rates. It is not hard to understand why: cuts are easy to implement and appear to deliver clear savings. But cuts in fees are a poor long-term solution to the problem of increasing health care costs. They make it more likely that physicians will decide not to accept new Medicare patients; further penalize already efficient systems; cause some to increase utilization to make up for revenue losses; and—most importantly—do little to encourage the collaborative efforts needed to improve health, better coordinate care, reduce regional duplication, and help beneficiaries avoid unnecessary care.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×