[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.87.3. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
December 19, 2007

Imaging of Pulmonary EmbolismToo Much of a Good Thing?

Author Affiliations
 

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.

JAMA. 2007;298(23):2788-2789. doi:10.1001/jama.298.23.2788

The study by Anderson and colleagues1 in this issue of JAMA convincingly demonstrates that computed tomographic pulmonary angiography (CTPA) is not inferior to ventilation-perfusion (/) lung scanning for the exclusion of pulmonary embolism (PE). Confirmation on this point is comforting because CTPA has had a wide range of sensitivities reported for detection of PE2 but nevertheless has largely supplanted /scanning for several years for this purpose.3

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×