[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.191.72. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Viewpoint
April 18, 2012

Risk Models and Patient-Centered EvidenceShould Physicians Expect One Right Answer?

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts (Dr Kent); Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota (Dr Shah).

JAMA. 2012;307(15):1585-1586. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.469

All models are wrong, but some are useful.—George Box

A fundamental contradiction of evidence-based medicine (EBM) is that evidence is derived from groups, whereas medicine is applied to individuals. Inferring individual effects from average group effects is an example of the fallacy of division. Even in a randomized trial, benefit in a summary result does not imply that the probability of benefitting outweighs the risk of harm for all (or even most) patients within the trial.1

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×