[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.19.31. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
April 8, 1998

Standards for Scientific Behavior and Research Integrity

Author Affiliations
 

Margaret A.WinkerMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 1998;279(14):1067-1068. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-14-jac80003

To the Editor.—The article by Dr Korenman and colleagues1on research integrity provides a useful characterization of research as acts in 4 domains. While the authors sound optimistic that researchers and administrators agree on what research integrity is, based on somewhat similar malfeasance ratings, such ratings represent, at maximum for a particular act, 45.5% of the 606 scientists (Act 1-3) and 51.6% of the 91 administrators (Act 1-1) who responded. Even with 100% agreement that plagiarism (Act 2-1) is unethical, such agreement represents only 22.6% of scientists and 28.6% of administrators who responded. I am concerned about the effect of response bias and bothered by disparities over whether acts of unethical behavior should even be addressed.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×