[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.122.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
June 24, 1998

Time Lag Bias in Publishing Clinical Trials—Reply

Author Affiliations
 

Margaret A.WinkerMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 1998;279(24):1952-1953. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-279-24-jac80011

In Reply.— We disagree with Dr Arida's assertion that the term time lag bias is an unnecessary departure from the well-established term publication bias. We accept that publication bias is the appropriate term when referring to studies that remain unpublished because of the direction or strength of their results. However, the term publication bias does not capture the differences between studies that remain unpublished and those that, because of the direction or strengths of their results, are published later than other studies.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×