[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.122.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
August 19, 1998

Accuracy of Tick Identification in a Lyme Disease Endemic Area

Author Affiliations
 

Margaret A.WinkerMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 1998;280(7):602-603. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-280-7-jbk0819-m

To the Editor.—In areas where Lyme disease is endemic, physicians may routinely be confronted with the problem of arthropod identification and tick-bite management. Because Lyme disease can be difficult to diagnose, history of a bite from the vector tick, Ixodes scapularis (Figure 1), may play a role in diagnosing suspected cases.1 Evidence of a tick bite may result from observations of the patient or the physician. However, the accuracy of identification by persons not trained in entomology is unknown. Consequences of misidentification may lead to misdiagnosis of Lyme disease and unnecessary prophylactic treatment with antibiotics. As part of a tick-bite study in Westchester County, New York,2,3 a Lyme disease endemic area,4 we assessed the accuracy of tick identification by physicians and the public from arthropods submitted for species identification or verification.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×