[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.158.163. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
September 16, 1998

Evaluating Antismoking Advertising Campaigns—Reply

Author Affiliations
 

Margaret A.WinkerMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 1998;280(11):964-965. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-280-11-jbk0916

In Reply.—Drs Connolly and Harris1 criticize us for describing the Massachusetts antitobacco media campaign as "a more youth-oriented approach" than the one California used. Yet, they use the fact that the Massachusetts campaign was more youth oriented to explain why we saw faster declines in per capita consumption of cigarettes in California than in Massachusetts. They are correct in stating that youth consume only 2% to 3% of cigarettes, which is another reason that a youth-focused program is a mistake. It is, after all, the adults whom tobacco kills. Moreover, while it is preferable to prevent tobacco use altogether, to stop smoking in young adulthood avoids the long-term health consequences.2,3

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×