[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Books, Journals, New Media
October 7, 1998

Women in Medicine

Author Affiliations

Margaret A.WinkerMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthorPhil B.FontanarosaMD, Senior EditorIndividualAuthor

JAMA. 1998;280(13):1141-1142. doi:10-1001/pubs.JAMA-ISSN-0098-7484-280-13-jbk1007

In Reply: Every independent scientific body that has reviewed the scientific evidence has concluded that exposure to passive smoke is harmful to health.1 As the title of our article suggests, the goal of our study was to determine why many published review articles reach conclusions that differ from these independent scientific bodies. We investigated several factors in addition to quality and funding source that might be associated with outcome, including peer review, date of publication, and topic of review. The only factor associated with the conclusion of a review article was the affiliation of its author: 94% of reviews by tobacco industry–affiliated authors concluded that passive smoking is not harmful compared with 13% of reviews by authors without tobacco-industry affiliations.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview