[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.167.137. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 656
Citations 0
Letters
March 21, 2012

Coronary Heart Disease Risk Factors and Mortality

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, McGill University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (hailey.banack@mail.mcgill.ca).

JAMA. 2012;307(11):1137-1138. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.324

To the Editor: The study by Dr Canto and colleagues1 provides an example of an epidemiological phenomenon that deserves wider recognition. Differential selection from an underlying population cohort into a study data set can reverse the direction of observed associations, making a deleterious factor appear protective. It is well-known that conditioning on a variable that is affected by both an exposure and outcome can produce a distortion known as selection bias.2 Admission into the analysis data set in this study was a function of both the exposure (number of cardiovascular risk factors) and the outcome (all-cause, in-hospital, or 30-day mortality) because deaths occurring before hospitalization and patients with existing cardiovascular disease diagnoses were excluded. Approximately 30% of MIs lead to death prior to hospitalization.3 In the study, 75% of those who were admitted to the hospital after their MI were excluded (1.62 million of 2.16 million; Figure 1 in the article).

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×