[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.142.219. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
August 24, 1935

PREPUTIAL CALCULUS

JAMA. 1935;105(8):615. doi:10.1001/jama.1935.02760340061027

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:—  To the extensive bibliography of the paper by Dr. N. R. Ingraham Jr., Preputial Calculus, a Clinical Rarity (The Journal, July 13, p. 106) I wish to add the case described by D. Giordano (Compendio di Chirurgia Italiana, Turin, Unione Tipografica Editrice Torinese 2:746, 1911) which, freely translated, reads as follows: "I was asked by a colleague to see a clergyman and to be ready, eventually, to perform an amputation for cancer of the glans penis. The foreskin was abnormally distended, showing bluish veins, an extreme phimosis, a muddy fluid of foul odor leaking from the narrow passage. The palpation was painful and impressive of a stony consistency about the glans penis. When the opening was cleaned and the foreskin made to slide in various directions, a whitish surface of calcareous appearance was noticed, against which the probe produced a sound like over a stone. And

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×