[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
November 23, 1935


Author Affiliations


JAMA. 1935;105(21):1702-1703. doi:10.1001/jama.1935.02760470056025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor: —  Dr. Ustvedt's statement (The Journal, March 9, p. 851) that "tuberculin negative individuals who are not exposed to infection cannot be expected to develop clinical tuberculosis" has been the crux of our argument, which Dr. Harrington and I have emphasized in numerous publications for fifteen years. Therefore his statement that "this is a fact that has been neglected by many investigators and latest by Myers and Harrington" is hardly justified. On this point, we are in complete agreement with Ustvedt. One of the objects of our paper (The Journal, Nov. 17, 1934, p. 1530) was to emphasize the fact that children who react negatively to the tuberculin test, when observed over a period of years and into adult life, are much better risks from the standpoint of the development of clinical tuberculosis than children who at the same time have positive tuberculin reactions. To be sure,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview