[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.185.157. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorials
January 4, 1964

CERVICAL CORD INJURY

JAMA. 1964;187(1):54-55. doi:10.1001/jama.1964.03060140060018

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

The care of the patient with quadriplegia secondary to cord damage has not yet reached a level comparable to that given other patients with severe paralysis. Because injury to the cervical spinal cord results in such devastating loss, a defeatist attitude of helplessness and hopelessness all too often pervades this type of care. However, a fairly high degree of independence and self-sufficiency is possible for most patients if a program based on preserving all remaining function is begun early.

The principles of treatment are not difficult to put into practice. There are two major considerations: (1) to prevent the added damage of decubiti, contractures, and further neurological loss, and (2) to make maximum use of residual function.

The first concern is the prevention of further neurological trauma. Since the origin of the brachial plexus is in the cervical area, any progression of spinal-cord or root damage results in loss of

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×