[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
August 17, 1964

To Err With Air

Author Affiliations

Spokane, Wash

JAMA. 1964;189(7):587. doi:10.1001/jama.1964.03070070059025

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor:—  Relative to Dr. Hartzell's communication "To Err With Air" in the Feb 8, 1964, issue (JAMA187:455) and the discussion in the May 25, 1964, issue (JAMA188:762), it seems to me that all the discussants have missed the point.The question comes up, what is a radiologist? Is he a true consultant, ie, are patients referred to him with certain details of the clinical findings and an outline of the problem, his opinion to be submitted as a report to the referring physician? Or is he a glorified super radiographer making a series of films to be submitted to the physician with a report which may be ignored?As a consultant, the radiologist is justified in using any method of examination he desires, including fluoroscopy with adequate palpation, double contrast studies, high voltage techniques, or a combination of any of these. At any rate,

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview