[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.8.87. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Other Articles
March 2, 1963

Further comment on the article cited follows.

Author Affiliations

New York City

JAMA. 1963;183(9):807-808. doi:10.1001/jama.1963.03700090127034

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor:  —In a recent issue of The Journal, Moore, Stunkard, and Srole expressed uncertainty regarding the accuracy of reports of body weight. This problem also arose in connection with a study we have been conducting on the association between overweight and mortality from cardiovascular disease. Accordingly, we have been comparing a person's statement of his own weight with that of others in the household and with the scale reading taken at the end of the interview. While the work is still in progress, a report of our preliminary findings seems appropriate at this time.For 144 subjects, the accuracy of estimate is quite high; the product moment correlation between subjects' self-estimates and scale weights is r=0.98. This is also true for males and females taken separately. In addition, another adult in the same household is able to give an accurate report of the subject's weight; r=0.94. Although Moore

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×