[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 23.23.54.109. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Viewpoint
July 4, 2012

“The Battered-Child Syndrome” 50 Years LaterMuch Accomplished, Much Left to Do

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Dr Leventhal); and Office of the Vice Chancellor for Health Affairs, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora (Dr Krugman).

JAMA. 2012;308(1):35-36. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.6416

A half century ago, Kempe and colleagues1published in JAMA “The Battered-Child Syndrome,” an article that would change the way physicians and others care for children with injuries. Although this article was not the first in the medical literature to address the problem of physical abuse of children, the authors did report the first epidemiologic study and highlighted important aspects of the evaluation of suspected abuse: (1) the discrepancy between the stated history and clinical findings, (2) questions that can be asked of parents when physicians are concerned about possible abuse, (3) some of the key physical examination and radiographic findings in abused children, (4) associated findings such as poor hygiene and failure to thrive, and (5) reasons physicians might have difficulty believing that parents can hurt their children.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×