[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.166.22. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 254
Citations 0
Letters
August 8, 2012

Brachytherapy vs Whole-Breast Irradiation for Breast Cancer

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Senior Editor.

Author Affiliations: Department of Radiation Oncology, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Piscataway, New Jersey (Dr Khan; atif.khan@rwjuh.edu); Michigan Healthcare Professionals, 21st Century Oncology, Farmington Hills (Dr Vicini); and Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond (Dr Arthur).

JAMA. 2012;308(6):567-568. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.8486

To the Editor: Dr Smith and colleagues1 compared outcomes of whole breast irradiation (WBI) vs brachytherapy in older women with breast cancer. We are concerned that the findings from this claims-based study may result in unnecessary anxiety for women treated with brachytherapy. Claims-based studies using large databases are subject to the limitations of retrospective analyses and can be especially problematic if data on important and validated determinants of treatment success are not available. We are unsure if subsequent mastectomy is a valid surrogate for breast conservation as indicated by the authors. Laterality of breast surgery is typically not reported in Medicare claims. Thus a patient having a contralateral mastectomy for any reason would be scored as a treatment failure in the study. Also, we believe the 5-year difference in subsequent mastectomy rates after brachytherapy of 1.77% reported in the study should not be interpreted as inferior to WBI; a difference of this magnitude is of questionable clinical relevance.2

×