[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.120.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
November 16, 2011

Underuse of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention—Reply

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Internal Medicine, Saint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute, Kansas City, Missouri (pchan@cc-pc.com).

JAMA. 2011;306(19):2094-2095. doi:10.1001/jama.2011.1659

In Reply: Dr Restuccia and colleagues are correct in noting that threats to the quality of PCI include underuse, overuse (which we examined), and misuse (performing the procedure poorly1 in those who appropriately receive it). We believe that underuse is an important problem that warrants further research. Hemingway et al2 have suggested that failure to perform revascularization in appropriate patients can be associated with poorer outcomes. Further insight into underuse, however, will require a different methodology than what has been applied in prior studies.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×