[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.92.62. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Viewpoint
September 26, 2012

Beyond Joint Implant RegistriesA Patient-Centered Research Consortium for Comparative Effectiveness in Total Joint Replacement

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Orthopedics and Physical Rehabilitation (Drs Franklin and Ayers), Department of Quantitative Health Sciences (Dr Allison), University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester.

JAMA. 2012;308(12):1217-1218. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.12568

Despite the proven effectiveness of total joint replacement (TJR) surgery in relieving advanced knee and hip arthritis pain, TJR outcomes have come under intense public scrutiny in recent years. The 2010 recall of ASR metal-on-metal hip implants1 heightened awareness of the importance for implant safety surveillance for this high-cost and high-use procedure and exposed the need for a national systematic patient-centered outcomes monitoring system. These safety concerns and the exponential growth in TJR use—given the demographics of the baby boomer generation—emphasize the need for systematic comparative effectiveness research (CER) to inform patients, physicians, and policy makers about the optimal practices in TJR surgery.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×