[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.130.145. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Viewpoint
January 9, 2013

How to Decide Whether a Clinical Practice Guideline Is Trustworthy

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill (Drs Ransohoff and Pignone); and Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth College, West Lebanon, New Hampshire (Dr Sox).

JAMA. 2013;309(2):139-140. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.156703

The proliferation of practice guidelines and recent controversies about cancer screening guidelines highlight the need to decide which guidelines are trustworthy. Cancer screening guidelines exemplify the challenge of public trust in guidelines. A firestorm of controversy (created in part by news media, professional organizations, disease advocacy groups, and politicians) surrounds discussions of screening for prostate cancer (should screening be routinely recommended, discussed, or discouraged?), breast cancer (should screening start at age 40 or 50 years?), and colon cancer (is colonoscopy preferred or are any of several test strategies acceptable?). Trust is important because guidelines set the de facto standard for medical practice and therefore influence clinical decisions about individual patients, practice measures, insurance coverage, and reimbursement.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×