[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.141.60. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 788
Citations 0
Letters
January 23/30, 2013

Blood Culture Collection for Suspected Bacteremia—Reply

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Senior Editor.

Author Affiliations: University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (adetsky@mtsinai.on.ca).

JAMA. 2013;309(4):339. doi:10.1001/jama.2012.113524

In Reply: Dr Eckert and colleagues are correct that there is an error in the Box in our article. The 3 variables they cite are indeed missing. We reviewed the study by Shapiro et al1 and agree the 3 variables should be included in the rule. However, in doing so, we noted that the Shapiro et al report also seems to have an error in that their Table 3 lists the rule but omits the variable neutrophils greater than 80%. As a result, we contacted Dr Bates, one of the authors of the original article, to determine whether this omission was also unintentional. He confirmed that it was.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×