[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.147.238.168. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 1,041
Citations 0
Letters
April 17, 2013

Reporting Noninferiority Trials

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Senior Editor.

Author Affiliation: Pioneer Valley Hospital, Salt Lake City, Utah (scottaberegg@gmail.com).

JAMA. 2013;309(15):1584-1585. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.3086

To the Editor: Dr Piaggio and colleagues1 presented an updated extension of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement for reporting noninferiority and equivalence trials. I believe the statement should be revised so that interpretation of noninferiority trials is not biased.

Because Figure 1 in the article has a zone of inferiority that is asymmetric (it lacks a negative delta on the left to mirror the positive delta on the right), superiority of the new treatment is more likely than inferiority, and an advantage is conferred to the therapy arbitrarily designated as new. For example, if a new anticoagulant is compared with warfarin (reference treatment) and the results statistically favor the new anticoagulant by any margin, it is declared superior (scenario A in Figure 1).

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×