[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.147.69. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 693
Citations 0
Letters
May 15, 2013

Use of Administrative Data for Public Reporting of Outcomes

Author Affiliations
 

Letters Section Editor: Jody W. Zylke, MD, Senior Editor.

Author Affiliations: Departments of Surgery (Dr Utter; garth.utter@ucdmc.ucdavis.edu) and Internal Medicine (Dr Romano), University of California, Davis, Medical Center, Sacramento.

JAMA. 2013;309(19):1991-1992. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.4544

To the Editor: In their Viewpoint regarding the use of administrative data (ie, International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification [ICD-9-CM]) in public reporting of outcomes and pay for performance, Dr Farmer and colleagues1 argued for “a national, standardized system for outcome reporting” separate from administrative data that is “minimally affected by the incentives to alter coding created by public reporting.” Count us as skeptics.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×