[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.146.176.35. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 437
Citations 0
Comment & Response
January 15, 2014

Physician Payment Incentives to Improve Care Quality—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Francisco
  • 2New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene, Queens, New York
  • 3Philip R. Lee Institute of Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco
JAMA. 2014;311(3):304. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284478

In Reply Drs Himmelstein and Woolhandler suggest that pay-for-performance incentives led clinicians to falsify records. The program we evaluated was designed to align incentives with delivering high-quality care, rather than high-volume care, which is the incentive alignment under fee-for-service, and to pay clinicians more for doing what is difficult, such as controlling blood pressure in a patient with comorbidities.

We have no data specifically on falsification. However, prior literature on Healthcare Effectiveness Data and Information Set measures found that clinicians generally round to the nearest number on a 10 scale (ie, round to 130 mm Hg for a systolic blood pressure measurement of 129 mm Hg or 131 mm Hg).1 In reviewing data from our practices abstracted by a third party,2 we found this rounding behavior in both study groups. Of 1651 visits reviewed, among systolic blood pressure measurements ranging from 129 to 131 mm Hg, the control group (n = 141) percentages for readings were 4.2% at 129 mm Hg, 93.0% at 130 mm Hg, and 2.8% at 131 mm Hg, and in the incentive group (n = 116), they were 1.7%, 91.3%, and 6.9%, respectively.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×