[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.159.27. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 314
Citations 0
Comment & Response
January 22/29, 2014

Patient-Reported Outcome Alert Monitoring—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1Primary Care and Clinical Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
  • 2Medicine, Ethics, Society, and History, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, England
JAMA. 2014;311(4):420-421. doi:10.1001/jama.2013.284330

In Reply Dr Thombs and colleagues make 2 overarching points. The first is that a system of active PRO alert monitoring is tantamount to screening, and second, that in the specific case of depression, screening is unlikely to be of benefit and may cause harm.

They conclude that, in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki,1 PRO alert monitoring should only be implemented when the potential benefits outweigh the potential harms and these potential harms are minimized. We agree with this conclusion. The purpose of our Viewpoint was to draw attention to this obligation in the context of PRO alerts and to open debate about how best to achieve this.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×