[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 23.23.54.109. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Viewpoint
March 5, 2014

Legal and Ethical Responsibilities Following Brain Death: The McMath and Muñoz Cases

Author Affiliations
  • 1O'Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law, Georgetown University Law Center, Washington, DC
JAMA. 2014;311(9):903-904. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.660

Death is imbued with social, cultural, and religious meaning. From a legal and scientific perspective, however, death is a definable event. A patient’s death makes it possible, even obligatory, to cease treatment and enables the harvesting of organs for transplantation to extend life for others. The clear line between life and death is important because physicians will not squander scarce medical resources or violate medical ethics by imposing treatment after the patient is dead. With a clear diagnosis, family members can also accept the death of a loved one and begin the process of mourning.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×