[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.66.254. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
June 11, 2008

Biofilms and Chronic Infections

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Medical Biofilm Research Institute, Lubbock, Texas (Dr Wolcott); and Center for Genomic Sciences, Allegheny Singer Research Institute, Allegheny General Hospital, and Departments of Microbiology and Immunology, and Otolaryngology−Head and Neck Surgery, Drexel College of Medicine, Allegheny Campus, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Dr Ehrlich).

JAMA. 2008;299(22):2682-2684. doi:10.1001/jama.299.22.2682

The prevailing paradigm of infectious disease is based on the work of Koch and colleagues, who more than 150 years ago isolated individual strains of bacteria and developed the pure culture method that is still used today. That work enlightened medicine by firmly establishing the germ theory of transmissible diseases and demonstrated that diseases like dysentery, tuberculosis, and anthrax are caused by microbiological agents.1 Hence, the field of microbiology developed around Koch's methods with clinical microbiologists working overwhelmingly with pure log-phase cultures in nutrient-rich media because this approach provided such a powerful tool for the study of acute epidemic bacterial diseases. However, this approach that examines only planktonic bacteria (free-floating, single cell phenotype) may have limited development of a more thorough understanding of microbial processes. In most natural environments and in chronic bacterial infections, the planktonic phenotype generally exists only transiently, and usually as a minor population.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×