[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.166.89.187. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
December 3, 2008

Closing the Evidence Gap in the Use of Emerging Testing Technologies in Clinical Practice

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Center for Translational and Policy Research on Personalized Medicine, School of Pharmacy, Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, and UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco.

JAMA. 2008;300(21):2542-2544. doi:10.1001/jama.2008.754

New testing technologies—increasingly based on genomic information—are essential in the shift toward personalized medicine and molecular targeted therapies. Considering the rapid proliferation of new tests, health care insurers and policy makers are interested in assessing evidence about their use and value.

It is critical to build an evidence base to support effective decision making related to testing technologies as they are used in clinical practice. The example of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2, or ERBB2) testing for breast cancer illustrates the challenges and opportunities. Many groups, including the Institute of Medicine, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society, President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, and Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice and Prevention Project, have cited the need to improve the evidence base for genomic and testing technologies. This Commentary extends previous work, emphasizing the need for evidence to assess how technologies are actually used in clinical practice.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×