[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.159.27. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
December 3, 2008

Review of The Invisible Cure—Reply

JAMA. 2008;300(21):2485. doi:10.1001/jama.2008.747

In Reply: Perhaps because I found fault as well as (mostly) praise for her book, Dr Epstein suggests I had an undeclared conflict of interest due to an unflattering portrayal in her book. Epstein in fact introduces me as a “voice in the wilderness” who “had been arguing for years that abstinence, faithfulness, and reductions in casual sex had been more important than condoms in Uganda.”1(p187) This is a portrayal I find accurate, not unflattering, and not unlike Epstein's own position. However, on p 188 Epstein claims I defended “abstinence-only-until-marriage programs.” This is misleading; I have written and stated repeatedly that abstinence is only one part of a comprehensive prevention program.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×