[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
January 7, 2009

Outcomes in the Era of Bare-Metal Stents vs the Era of Drug-Eluting Stents

JAMA. 2009;301(1):33-34. doi:10.1001/jama.2008.899

To the Editor: Dr Malenka and colleagues1 described the protective effect of drug-eluting stents against repeat revascularization procedures by comparing frequency of revascularization in the bare-metal stent era to the frequency after drug-eluting stents came on the market. In doing so, they took a step back from the exposure itself—drug-eluting vs bare-metal stent—and instead implicitly used the era as a proxy for the stent exposure. Presumably, they did this because they believed that the exposure to drug-eluting stent would be confounded by unmeasured factors that they could not adjust for with the available data.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview