[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
JAMA 100 Years Ago
January 21, 2009


JAMA. 2009;301(3):335. doi:10.1001/jama.2008.966

An item in our London letter this week again calls attention to a form of exercise as healthful as, in this country, it is uncommon. Surgeon-Major Hinton, who enjoys the distinction of being the oldest member of the Royal College of Surgeons, in his ninety-fifth year is reported as “walking for pleasure five miles or more a day.” How many Americans—physicians or laymen—of even one-third the age of this veteran surgeon walk half of that distance daily? In the country the buggy, in the city the ubiquitous street car, and in both the ever-increasing number of automobiles, all operate to make us a nation of riders rather than of walkers. While within the past year walking has been taken up as a passing fad, pedestrianism as a recreation is practically unknown in this country. So much is this so that a man seen walking along a country road is mentally estimated as either a book agent or a tramp—the estimate varying according to his general appearance. Thus a vicious circle is established and the thought of being eccentric operates to make walking unpopular. Yet from a hygienic standpoint there is probably no healthier or more invigorating form of exercise. The various ingenious substitutes in the form of calisthenics are, as is the case with all substitutes, a poor excuse for the real article. Horseback riding, which seems to be popular among a certain class, is probably equal to walking as a form of exercise. But horseback riding is possible only for the few, certainly not for the average city dweller. Walking is possible for all, and a brisk four- or five-mile walk, taken not as a duty but as a recreation, is a physical and mental tonic of no mean value. Did it cost money instead of involving effort it would be more popular.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview