[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.159.197.114. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Medical News & Perspectives
April 1, 1998

Is It Ig Nobler for Science to Suffer the Slings & Arrows of Outrageous Foolery?

Author Affiliations
 

Not Available

Not Available

JAMA. 1998;279(13):979-981. doi:10.1001/jama.279.13.979

Twas the saying of an ancient sage, . . . that humor was the only test of gravity, and gravity of humor. For a subject which would not bear raillery was suspicious; and a jest which would not bear a serious examination was certainly false wit.—Anthony Cooper, Earle of Shaftesbury (1671-1713)

SHOULD SCIENCE always be taken seriously? That question is at the heart of a debate that has been smoldering ever since the United Kingdom's top science adviser, Sir Robert May, warned of the risk of poking fun at scientists without their consent (Nature. 1996;383:291). What provoked his outcry may have been the propensity of scientists in the United Kingdom to win more than their share of Ig Nobel Prizes.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×