[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.211.120.181. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Books, Journals, New Media
October 10, 2001

DangerousnessClinical Assessment of Dangerousness: Empirical Contributions

Author Affiliations
 

Harriet S.MeyerMD, Contributing EditorDavid H.MorseMS, Journal Review EditorRobertHoganMD, adviser for new media

 

Not Available

 

edited by Georges-Franck Pinard and Linda Pagani, 286 pp, $59.95, ISBN 0-521-64123-3, New York, NY, Cambridge University Press, 2000.

JAMA. 2001;286(14):1768-1769. doi:10.1001/jama.286.14.1768-JBK1010-2-1

There are two types of clinicians: those who have had patients at risk for violence and those who will. Clinicians in all specialties need to know how to recognize and evaluate the potentially violent patient in order to provide appropriate management and disposition. For example, as I have noted elsewhere, doctors are told that every physician in the United States, regardless of specialty or location conducted, has seen a battered woman in the office in the last two weeks.1 As part of a clinically supportive evaluation, abused women should be asked if they are considering self-harm or violent retribution against their abusers or both.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×