[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.176.107. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
Clinician's Corner
August 26, 2009

Setting Priorities for Patient SafetyEthics, Accountability, and Public Engagement

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Surgery and Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Health Policy and Management, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (Dr Pronovost) and The Johns Hopkins Berman Institute of Bioethics (Dr Faden), Baltimore, Maryland.

JAMA. 2009;302(8):890-891. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1177

Patients continue to experience preventable harms. As a result, policy makers, physicians, and members of the public have intensified their efforts to improve patient safety. Quiz Ref IDThe Joint Commission publishes National Patient Safety Goals, the National Quality Forum recommends safe practices, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will not pay for certain preventable complications, and health care organizations are taking action to reduce preventable harm. Although these actions are welcome, they raise ethical questions about selecting health care areas or patient populations for improvement efforts. In this Commentary, we explore the contentious issue of deciding what warrants a priority in patient safety and offer strategies to guide further discussion, policy, and research.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×