[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.175.236. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Special Communication
November 11, 2009

Shared Medical Regulation in a Time of Increasing Calls for Accountability and TransparencyComparison of Recertification in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Academy of Medical Royal Colleges, London, England (Drs Shaw and Black); American Board of Internal Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (Dr Cassel); and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada (Dr Levinson).

JAMA. 2009;302(18):2008-2014. doi:10.1001/jama.2009.1620
Abstract

In the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom, the medical profession is accountable to the public for the delivery and quality of care provided to patients. Traditionally, this accountability has been achieved through the development and maintenance of professional standards established by the profession itself—self-regulation. Medical self-regulation is being re-examined by regulators, government, and the profession in response to a range of drivers including payers seeking ways to hold physicians accountable for cost-effective care; patients seeking more information about their physician's qualifications; and the emergence of a number of high-profile cases of unacceptable medical practice. This article outlines the current state of medical regulation in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom and highlights the increasing external pressure on the self-regulatory framework that is leading to a shift toward shared regulation between the profession and other stakeholders.

×