[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.161.128.52. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Commentary
March 10, 2010

The Need for Improved Surveillance of Occupational Disease and Injury

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Open Society Institute, New York, New York (Mr Wolfe); and Mailman School of Public Health, Department of Sociomedical Sciences, Center for the History and Ethics of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, New York (Dr Fairchild).

JAMA. 2010;303(10):981-982. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.248

In mid-November 2009, the Government Accountability Office (GAO)1 released a report documenting the failure of current surveillance systems to capture the extent of work-related injury and illness in the United States. Independent assessments of the national surveillance system demonstrate that up to 80% of worker illness and injury are missed. The GAO documented that more than two-thirds of occupational health physicians report that workers fear disciplinary action for disclosing an injury or illness. More than a third of these physicians reportedly had been asked by company officials or workers to provide care that would not trigger an incident report even when it was “not sufficient to properly treat” the condition.1

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×