[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.204.247.205. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
March 10, 2010

Charting a Path From Comparative Effectiveness Funding to Improved Patient-Centered Health Care

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC (Drs Conway and Clancy); the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Maryland (Dr Clancy); and Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio (Dr Conway).

JAMA. 2010;303(10):985-986. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.259

Patients and physicians are fortunate to confront expanded options for diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring. While physicians strive to tailor recommendations to the unique characteristics and circumstances of each patient, many decisions today must be made without reliable comparative information. That information gap is frustrating for patients, who too often undergo trial and error medicine, as well as for physicians. Moreover, few health care organizations are designed to harness the best clinical insights for widespread dissemination and learning. It is precisely this chasm that a focus on comparative effectiveness (CE) research, also known as patient-centered health research, is intended to address.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×