[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.197.65.227. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
March 17, 2010

Liquid-Based Cytology vs Conventional Cytology in Detecting Cervical Cancer

JAMA. 2010;303(11):1034-1035. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.277

To the Editor: Drs Schiffman and Solomon1 wrote an Editorial to accompany the randomized controlled trial by Siebers and colleagues,2 which found that liquid-based cytology did not perform better than conventional cytology. The Editorial stated that these findings are “unlikely to have a major effect on cytology screening methods in the United States.” The implication that current practices will not change (ie, that liquid-based cytology will generally be the exclusive method used) is important for resource-limited programs such as the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program (NBCCEDP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×