[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.163.129.96. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Citations 0
Letters
April 7, 2010

Evidence From Randomized Controlled Trials, Meta-analyses, and Subgroup Analyses

JAMA. 2010;303(13):1253-1255. doi:10.1001/jama.2010.366

To the Editor: Drs Hennekens and DeMets1 argued that large RCTs designed to test a priori hypotheses are the best strategy to detect small to moderate benefit or harm from drugs. They suggested that the results of meta-analyses or subgroup analyses of RCTs should be considered as hypothesis-generating and formally tested in suitably powered RCTs. This is a sensible strategy for evaluating potential benefits of a drug but may be impractical for exploring potential harms.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×