[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.205.19.31. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Editorial
June 25, 2014

Breast Cancer ScreeningShould Tomosynthesis Replace Digital Mammography?

Author Affiliations
  • 1Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston
  • 2University of Toronto, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, Canada
JAMA. 2014;311(24):2488-2489. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.6421

Another spirited debate has ensued over the benefits of breast cancer screening,1 freshly stimulated by the recent publication of the 25-year follow-up results of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (CNBSS) that showed no difference in breast cancer–related mortality in screened women vs controls.2 This latest controversy developed even though the CNBSS is the only one of 8 randomized clinical trials of screening mammography that failed to find a reduction in mortality,3 and despite substantial and well-described limitations in the CNBSS methods,4 including poor image quality and problems in the randomization schema that created a screened cohort with more large palpable cancers than the control group. Fourteen more recent studies published between 2001 and 2010 using more modern technology have shown a 25% to 50% reduction in breast cancer–related mortality for women aged 40 to 74 years.5 In the interval since the randomized trials of screening and with the demonstration of improved diagnostic accuracy for women with dense breasts,6 digital mammography has supplanted film mammography as the screening technology of choice,7 and treatment of breast cancer has improved substantially.8

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×