[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 184.73.122.162. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Special Communication
May 5, 1999

Large-Core Needle Biopsy of Nonpalpable Breast Lesions

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Departments of Radiology (Drs Meyer, Smith, DiPiro, Denison, Harvey, Selland, and Durfee), Surgery (Drs Kaelin and Christian), and Pathology (Dr Lester), Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Mass.

JAMA. 1999;281(17):1638-1641. doi:10.1001/jama.281.17.1638
Context

Context An increasing number of nonpalpable abnormalities requiring breast biopsy are being identified due to the widespread use of screening mammography. Large-core needle biopsy (LCNB) has become an alternative to surgical excision.

Objective To determine whether LCNB is a safe and accurate technique to evaluate nonpalpable abnormalities found on breast imaging studies.

Design and Setting Case series at an institutional referral center from August 1, 1991, to December 31, 1997.

Patients A total of 1643 women with 1 or more suspicious breast abnormalities received LCNBs (n=1836 lesions).

Intervention The LCNB of the breast uses a 14- or 11-gauge needle with stereotactic localization or ultrasound guidance.

Main Outcome Measure Utility and potential limitations of LCNB compared with the criterion standard, surgical excision after wire localization.

Results Of the 1836 breast lesions sampled, 444 (24%) were found to be malignant. A total of 412 (22%) were found to be malignant on the initial LCNB and 202 repeat biopsies yielded 32 additional malignancies. Complications were infrequent: 1 patient experienced a superficial infection and 1 developed a pneumothorax after LCNB.

Conclusion Image-guided LCNB is a reliable diagnostic alternative to surgical excision of suspicious nonpalpable breast abnormalities.

×