[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 54.158.167.137. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Viewpoint
September 10, 2014

Engaging Medical Librarians to Improve the Quality of Review Articles

Author Affiliations
  • 1Spencer S. Eccles Health Sciences Library, Salt Lake City, Utah
  • 2Center for the Science of Healthcare Delivery, Knowledge Synthesis Program, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 3Deputy Editor, Clinical Reviews and Education, JAMA, Chicago, Illinois
JAMA. 2014;312(10):999-1000. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.9263

Review articles published in JAMA summarize various aspects of medical practice and are written by known authorities. An expert’s opinion about a topic has value, but often more can be learned by that expert’s assessment of all the pertinent literature. When reading individual research articles, readers could miss subtle features of the studies that are more apparent to an expert clinician-researcher. Readers benefit from the expert’s explanation of the validity and applicability of individual studies.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×